Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 49: 276-286, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1281376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Awake prone positioning (PP) has been used to avoid intubations in hypoxic COVID-19 patients, but there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy. Moreover, clinicians have little information to identify patients at high risk of intubation despite awake PP. We sought to assess the intubation rate among patients treated with awake PP in our Emergency Department (ED) and identify predictors of need for intubation. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted for known or suspected COVID-19 who were treated with awake PP in the ED. We excluded patients intubated in the ED. Our primary outcome was prevalence of intubation during initial hospitalization. Other outcomes were intubation within 48 h of admission and mortality. We performed classification and regression tree analysis to identify the variables most likely to predict the need for intubation. RESULTS: We included 97 patients; 44% required intubation and 21% were intubated within 48 h of admission. Respiratory oxygenation (ROX) index and P/F (partial pressure of oxygen / fraction of inspired oxygen) ratio measured 24 h after admission were the variables most likely to predict need for intubation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Among COVID-19 patients treated with awake PP in the ED prior to admission, ROX index and P/F ratio, particularly 24 h after admission, may be useful tools in identifying patients at high risk of intubation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Hypoxia/therapy , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Prone Position , Wakefulness , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Maryland , Middle Aged , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment
2.
Am J Med Sci ; 361(5): 567-574, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1161071

ABSTRACT

In December 2019 novel coronavirus-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus2 (SARS-CoV2)-originated from Wuhan, China, and spread rapidly around the world. This literature review highlights the dynamic nature of COVID-19 transmission and presentation. Analyzing 59 relevant articles up to May 1st, 2020 reflects that the main reported clinical manifestation of COVID-19 pandemic is fever and respiratory involvement. Also, current literature demonstrates a wide spectrum of different and atypical presentation(s) of COVID-19. The definite route of SARS-CoV2 transmission is respiratory droplets, however, virus nucleic acid has been detected in the stool and urine specimens as well. The severity of symptoms and outcomes of COVID-19 vary based on the patient's medical background, age, sex, and concurrent medical conditions (e.g. pregnancy). This is the first review that classifies all essential points regarding COVID-19 manifestations at a glance to improve the outcome of the patients by a better insight into diagnosis and management.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/metabolism , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/transmission , Humans , Lung/metabolism , Lung/physiopathology , Lung/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL